Debunking Myths about Offshore Companies, IBCs, and Offshore Corporations

Misconceptions have always sprung from a lack of understanding regarding specific phenomena, and the realm of international business is not exempt from the pattern. The scarcity of comprehensive information and the powerful influence exerted by the media on public opinion create an environment conducive to new myths, with the offshore industry serving as a fertile breeding ground for such misconceptions.

Misconceptions and false beliefs have become the underlying reasons why people fear to use offshore structures in international business. They simply perceive such entities to have a detrimental impact on reputation. However, this is yet another unfounded myth. By adhering to it, many businesspeople curtail their potential for wealth and growth.

Myth #1: Offshore companies, IBCs, and offshore corporations engage in illicit activities

This enduring myth has captured the minds of even the most prominent entrepreneurs for many decades. Offshore companies are commonly utilized for tax planning, capital protection, and fund accumulation for international investments. 

Their advantages include more favorable tax regimes, swift registration procedures, and flexible management. The myth surrounding offshore non-compliance is in part influenced by past practices when such structures were established anonymously, and banking accounts went unmonitored.

In today’s landscape, the practices mentioned are no longer relevant. The establishment of an offshore entity, along with opening a bank account or payment system, requires the provision of beneficiary information nowadays. Heightened scrutiny is now the norm, and different levels of personal information protection are in place for founders, shareholders, and beneficiaries. This includes the availability of open or closed registers and compliance with local laws, as observed in jurisdictions like Switzerland, let alone trusts and other mechanisms.

Regardless of the chosen offshore jurisdiction for company registration, local regulations strictly prohibit involvement in activities associated with the following domains:

• production and trafficking of drugs, psychotropic substances, and radioactive materials
• human trafficking.
• manufacture and distribution of weapons and other unlawful activities.

Without a doubt, offshore entities like offshore companies, IBCs, and offshore corporations come with enhanced managerial freedom, and their activities may not face the same level of government scrutiny as local businesses. However, you may not employ these structures for illicit purposes. Presently, the majority of offshore jurisdictions actively engage in the exchange of financial and tax-related information, complying with the standards set by organizations such as FATF and OECD. This clear commitment underscores their dedication to operating within legal boundaries.

FYI: Contrary to popular belief, opening a bank account for an offshore company after its registration is unrealistic. To establish a fully operational offshore entity with financial access, you shall simultaneously undertake company registration and bank account setup. Should you desire additional banking options, don’t hesitate to proactively engage with banks and initiate a discussion to explore the possibility of creating an account tailored to the needs of your offshore company. 

BENEFIT FROM INTERNATIONAL WEALTH SERVICES TO OPEN OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS

from 799 EUR

PREAPPROVAL of the application for non-resident banking services: personal account – from 799 EUR, corporate account – from 999 EUR

free

Choose foreign bank accounts together with professionals. Book free expert consultations

free

Choose payment systems for high-risk businesses. Book free professional expert consultations

Myth #2: The operations of offshore companies, IBCs, and offshore corporations remain unregulated

Numerous individuals hold the mistaken belief that companies incorporated in offshore jurisdictions may disregard local and international corporate laws. However, it is an entirely groundless myth, as it lacks any factual basis, not even accounting for a mere 10% of the truth.

Indeed, IBCs, BCs, and various types of offshore corporations enjoy greater freedom when it comes to taxation, administration, and decision-making. Nevertheless, they function within the legal frameworks of multiple countries:

• The country where they are considered tax residents, which may differ from the jurisdiction of incorporation and the residence of the company’s founder.
• The home country of the company’s owner, where regulations regarding controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) and currency control obligations are enforced.
• The jurisdiction where the offshore entity is registered.

Company treatment varies across different offshore jurisdictions, with some being more lenient and others imposing stricter regulations. However, regardless of the jurisdiction, it is not possible to register a legal entity or engage in entrepreneurial activities without government oversight. Compliance with applicable laws and regulations is mandatory.

Depending on the specific jurisdiction, certain requirements may be in place concerning the number of directors, secretaries, and the maintenance of financial records and reporting. Another common misconception is that anyone, regardless of residency, citizenship, or place of residence, may establish an offshore entity. This is not accurate, as each country has its own set of requirements that may align with or diverge from these myths.

Myth #3: Offshore companies, IBCs, and offshore corporations are exclusively established in blacklisted jurisdictions with high levels of corruption and criminality

Dispelling this myth requires a more comprehensive study that goes beyond the limitations of a single article. Even more so that it encompasses not just one myth but a complex network of mythical beliefs. 

Let us navigate the realm of fact versus fiction:

• Are being on blacklists, operating within offshore jurisdictions, and residing in countries with high levels of corruption or crime synonyms? The answer is a definitive no. This is a myth. Offshore jurisdictions are countries and territories where the corporate tax rate is reduced by 5 percentage points. This does not automatically imply a prevalence of corruption and crime. Blacklists encompass a multifaceted and intricate subject that is not always directly linked to offshore jurisdictions or corrupt nations. For instance, offshore jurisdictions such as Singapore, Hong Kong, Andorra, Liechtenstein, and Monaco come with minimal instances of criminal activity. On the contrary, offshore jurisdictions like Liberia and Jamaica, despite being associated with higher crime levels in their respective countries, do not offer the entire spectrum of offshore possibilities.
• Is it realistic to register offshore entities, IBCs, and offshore corporations in blacklisted countries in a short time, ensuring immediate and enduring full confidentiality? The answer is a resounding no. This is a myth and a violation of international norms, including those aimed at combating crime and tax evasion. While it may be possible to register an offshore company in such countries, achieving absolute 100% confidentiality is an unattainable objective.
• Do the most secure countries with zero tax rates inherently harbor high levels of crime and corruption, while simultaneously offering favorable conditions for those about to register zero-tax offshore companies with impeccable confidentiality? This concept is 90% mythical, with the remaining 10% acknowledging the partial truth about zero-tax aspects. The belief is mostly rooted in a myth. It is a significant misconception among founders who mistakenly choose such countries to establish business entities. 

Myth #4: IBCs, offshore corporations, and other offshore business structures evade tax obligations

Tax legislation varies across jurisdictions, with some offering zero tax rates or specific advantages for international a.k.a. offshore companies. However, a common requirement in all offshore jurisdictions is the payment of an annual fixed amount to the country’s budget. The latter is known as a license fee. The exact fee varies depending on the country and territory, but when businesses are properly structured, this payment method offers significant benefits:

• cost reduction
• precise future cost planning.

Believing that no tax obligations or payments are required after you register an offshore entity is both a myth and a misconception. Regardless of whether the country of incorporation imposes such fees, taxes are unavoidable. Therefore, recognize that you will still have to pay taxes at the source of income, which may be in another country.

Myth #5: Nominee services significantly enhance confidentiality

Although partly true, this myth comes with certain caveats. In practical terms, nominal services are frequently utilized for diverse purposes:

• meeting the requirement to have a local director or shareholder actively engaged in the business
• avoiding disclosure as the offshore company founder, even in official registries
• generating the impression of multiple founders, while in reality, there is only 1 person who owns the company, and so forth.

Attempting to conceal your identity as a founder and beneficiary through the use of nominees is no longer feasible. In the present day, with an automated information exchange system in place, identifying the beneficial owner of a bank account is no longer an issue. This information is shared with tax authorities and other regulatory entities either automatically or upon request.

Myth #6: Offshore companies lack reliability and trustworthiness

The above is another prevalent myth that deserves clarification. The truth is, a significant number of large corporations, well-known athletes, and successful businessmen choose offshore jurisdictions to safeguard their capital. This decision is motivated by the potential harm to a country’s reputation and the subsequent capital outflow to other jurisdictions if a bank or financial institution goes bankrupt or customers’ confidential information is disclosed. Considering these factors, it is only logical to conclude that reputable international banks, financial institutions, and companies would not willingly compromise their global standing and risk losing their valued clients.

Of course, you should conduct thorough due diligence on potential business partners before making substantial investments. However, the existence of shell companies is not limited to offshore jurisdictions alone. You will also find them in other countries. Therefore, regardless of the chosen jurisdiction, always prioritize robust security measures to ensure the utmost protection.

Myth #7: Registering an offshore company is an exorbitant expense

The costs associated with company registration and management depend on various factors. The latter are the type of business, the number and types of shareholders, and, of course, the incorporation jurisdiction. The common belief that this process is always excessively expensive is not necessarily true, as the reality is more nuanced.

Before you proceed with offshore company registration, carefully evaluate all the expenses involved and assess the potential returns on your investment. In some cases, it may not be financially feasible to establish an offshore company, particularly if business operations will not generate sufficient revenue to cover the associated costs.

Depending on the size of the business and your specific objectives, registering an offshore company may be a recommended strategy to enhance wealth and expedite the desired outcomes.